Low qPCR Efficiency

I’m experiencing issues with low and inconsistent qPCR efficiency while developing a quantification method for the A subunit of the hydrazine synthase gene (hzsA). I’m using primer pairs from a publication:

  • hzsA_1597F: 5′-WTYGGKTATCARTATGTAG-3′

  • hzsA_1857R: 5′-AAABGGYGAATCATARTGGC-3′

To create my standard, I used the TOPO TA cloning kit for sequencing, digested the plasmid with EcoRI, and purified it using the QIAGEN Nucleotide Removal Kit. DNA concentration was determined with a NanoDrop fluorospectrometer using the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit.

For qPCR, I prepared 10-fold serial dilutions of the DNA and used QIAGEN QuantiTect SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix with the following additions in a 25 µL reaction:

  • 0.5 µL of 25 mM MgCl₂ stock

  • 0.5 µL each of 15 µM forward and reverse primers

Under these conditions, I obtained an efficiency of 68% and a melting temperature of 55 °C.

In a preliminary test using only three standards (10⁶, 10⁵, and 10⁴ copies/µL), I increased the MgCl₂ to 1 µL of 25 mM stock, which improved efficiency to 95%. However, when I ran the full standard curve under the same conditions, the efficiency dropped to ~78%.

Does anyone have insight into why my qPCR efficiency varies so much, and what steps I can take to make it more consistent?

3 Likes

Navneet

While it is a good idea to use published primers, but the primers you listed look questionable. There is no reason why primers that have all sorts of “weird” bases would not work, but one of my first concerns about your assay not working would be that your primers have bases such as “W”, “Y” and “K”. If at all possible I would design at least 2 or 3 sets of primers and test those to see if you continue getting efficiency problems.

7 Likes